Mommy bloggers certainly captured a lot of attention in 2009. This often elusive, yet highly influential network of moms that took to social media with flagpoles, megaphones, and important insights on parenting, was all the rage in the media. Headline after headline we saw that these parental bloggers were so influential, they began accomplishing the “Holy Grail” of social media: churning a profit. If advertising was not enough, companies began buying reviews from mommy influencers to the point where the FTC had to step in and wag a finger, a story we weighed in on in our Strategy and Musings blog last June.

But if 2009 was the mommy blogger year, 2010 is already being penned as the “year of the daddy blogger” by an expert, a daddy blogger, a social media marketer, and a poll (currently resulting in 65% favorable to the idea). We even discussed the rising trend in Strategy and Musings last August in response to Sony’s DigiDad project.

Certainly daddy bloggers are on the rise and so are networks that are supporting them. They have taken to Twitter with their stories on parenthood and are already involving brands in their publications. Like the moms, each of them target a particular interest, but with a focus on parenthood, as a theme.

Here are a few:

The Dad List: http://www.thedadlist.com/

Natural Papa: http://naturalpapa.com/

Daddy Is Tired: http://www.daddyistired.com/

Mocha Dad: http://www.mochadad.com

DaddyGotCustody: http://daddygotcustody.com/

Playground Dad: http://playgrounddad.com/

LookyDaddy:  http://www.lookydaddy.com/

DadGoneMad: http://www.dadgonemad.com/

CynicalDad: http://www.cynicaldad.com/

LaidOffDad: http://laidoffdad.typepad.com/

DadCentric: http://www.dadcentric.com/

DadLogic:  http://dadlogic.net

This new trend of blogging begs the question, is this actually a new trend? And if so, is there a discernable difference between mommy and daddy bloggers apart from gender? Certainly topics will vary between the two types of blogs, but ultimately they are parenthood blogs and so, therefore, will appeal to the same demographics with the same marketing tactics. Parents read these blogs to participate in conversations about parenthood and to seek peer-oriented advice on products parents need. From a marketing perspective, the objectives and tactics will remain the same, whether or not the parent is a mommy or daddy.

The media is already making noises about  the next big trend and companies are not far behind in trying to tap this rising market. There is even talk of a daddy blogger convention. Regardless of whether that will happen, marketers will be trying to get a piece of the pie. Just follow any of the new daddy bloggers, and it will be obvious that an influencer can come out of anywhere — dads or moms, and that what matters most is the transparency in these types of consumer engagements.

Maybe 2011 will be the year of the Kiddy Blogger.

In light of Google’s decision to shut down six music blogs on Google’s properties Blogger and Blogspot for copyright infringement, there are perhaps many in the webiverse that are second guessing what they have on their sites. The fact is, it is extremely easy to violate copyright on the web and, increasingly, it is very difficult to know what the rules are.

To save brand managers and marketing and PR professionals the hassle of getting a law degree, following are three places where content can be found that is not bogged down with the threat of copyright litigation:

1. Flickr.

Flickr is arguably the leader of hosted web images on the web, although certainly sites like Picasa and SmugMug are certainly worth noting. Flickr’s unique feature of isolating “Creative Commons” licensed images, separates it from the pack. Creative Commons is a “copyleft” movement that attempts to put better controls on copyright law by allowing publishers to license their content however they choose. Some licenses are stricter than others, but each license makes very clear how the image, or work, can be used.

To use a photo or an image from Flickr on your blog or website, simply go to flickr.com and search for your picture. Click on “advanced search” and scroll down to the Creative Commons section. You can choose to look for pictures that you can use non-commercially, commercially, or with adaptation privileges. Then the resulting search will provide photos that you can, rest assured, use with the artist’s permission.

Note that even with Creative Commons there are limitations so be sure to read and understand the license. Most of the licenses under Creative Commons require that you attribute the source of the photo.  Often a link back to the Flickr photo with the Flickr user’s name is sufficient. When in doubt, Flickr makes it easy for you to contact the source and ask how he, or she, would like to be attributed.

2. Google

If you can’t find what you need on Flickr, Google has a photo search by Creative Commons as well. When you click on “advanced search” on the Google page you’ll see a selection about “usage rights” and you can easily choose your criteria from there before searching. This will pull up not only images, but also texts and blogs.

The search will return many Creative Commons licensed media, but also can include other more software-oriented licenses like the GFDL(GNU Free Document License) and things that are simply in the public domain. However, always check the source and make sure it explicitly releases those rights to you and, when in doubt, pass for something you are sure about.

3. Project Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is perhaps the largest online collection of public domain and freely licensed content on the web. One can read, download and email all the works of Shakespeare and Plato and listen to CD’s before downloading sheet music. There is so much content here, in fact, that it may difficult to sift through.

Gutenberg can be a resource for text, commentary, books and music, and each article explicitly details what is appropriate use of the content. Gutenberg boasts that its content can be used for “nearly all uses,” but there may be limitations that are detailed by entry.

The bottom line to copyright infringement is to use common sense.  Resting on with the idea that you are safe under “fair use” rules is not stable ground. Fair use is often ambiguous, vague, and easy to argue. Free licensing and public domain are safe avenues because the usage is clear. There are many tools in place to determine if what you are using is okay or not.

If you don’t know the source and can’t determine the copyright than don’t use it, because it isn’t yours.

It’s not news that large groups of bloggers influence buying decisions and that companies, in taking note, are sending free products to bloggers who have large followings with the hopes that they will either review the product itself or include it in their conversations with their followers.

Not really unlike the traditional route of sending a product to a journalist for review, with the exception being that journalists are ethically required to remain objective while bloggers, who may want to keep the flow of free products coming, might not always be.  The issue gets even murkier when companies, realizing that this is an inexpensive form of direct advertising, really a ‘goldmine’ for them, actually pay certain bloggers to write these reviews.

No wonder the FTC is taking note and planning to implement “self-regulation” policies for bloggers and other social media influencers, as detailed in a report co-written by Gunther Sonnenfeld of ThinkState and Emily Levin, a corporate attorney specializing in IP and eCommerce initiatives, “Why Brands Should Rethink Partnerships With Bloggers.”

And just in time, for problems abound…

One such example is that bloggers can make claims or have opinions about products that are not in line with the companies’ specs about a product.  This is worrisome, especially in the case of healthcare products.  The FTC position is that both advertiser and blogger are responsible for blogger’s false or unsubstantiated statements as well as the failure to disclose clearly that he/she is being paid for services – whether with free products or fees.

Another example cited in the report is that of a college student who has a reputation as a video game expert and maintains a personal blog where he posts entries about his gaming experiences and offer opinions about video game hardware and software.  As such it behooves the manufacturer of a newly released video game system to send the student a free copy of the system and ask the student to write about it on his blog.  The student tests the new gaming system and writes a favorable review.  Not much of a surprise here.   The FTC guideline states that the blogger should conspicuously disclose that he received the gaming system free of charge.

Look, advertisers can’t really play watchdog over conversations or disclosures, but it is their responsibility to monitor, as well as course-correct messaging and/or respective content positioning, to steer clear of the viral spread of misinformation about their products.  Moreover, reviews from paid bloggers cannot, and should not, be promoted as objective opinions.

And if a watchful eye from the FTC will help keep the boundaries between objective and subjective reviews well defined, I am all for it.  It may also engender a type of social responsibility that could spread throughout the blogging community at large…